Comments on: More on Mail Integration w/Actiontastic

By: jquig99

jquig99 — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:50:41 +0000

Thanks John – I’m looking forward to reading your post. BTW – have you checked out iGTD? It’s a new entry into the space. I’m going to play around with it this weekend.

By: John Wright

John Wright — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 21:48:15 +0000

How about I save you some time for more important stuff in other contexts . I did a bunch of work on GTD over the weekend and I will write up what I came up with. You gave me some good ideas and I no longer have the questions about your system that I did have. I will trackback when I write it up.

By: jquig99

jquig99 — Wed, 04 Apr 2007 14:21:52 +0000

Thanks for you comments – I’ll be able to walk through this before the weekend.

By: John Wright

John Wright — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:39:49 +0000

I guess I was wondering now that I think about it some more why there is a folder in Mail called actions and there is another one called todos_ical to send it to iCal and onto Actiontastic. Don’t all your actions that come from emails goto actiontastic and if so why not? I think all your other folders are for email processing but how do you write Mail Act on rules to divide them up? That seems like something that would have to be done manually.

By: John Wright

John Wright — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:34:27 +0000

By which I mean what actual rules do you create and why? I can kind of tell from the screenshot but couldn’t quite figure out what you are doing with those rules.

By: John Wright

John Wright — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 20:32:00 +0000

Would you mind explaining a bit more what you use the Mail Act on Rules for?